New questionnaire consisted of 24 short signed-finished and you can small open-ended Georgian tytöt kuuma concerns, including record parameters. The former issues attained information about experiences of financial transfers, volume and you may amount of schedules, demographic records, as well as, such, gender, age, and you will sexual positioning ( Desk 1), reasons to have glucose relationships ( Desk 2), and you can event out of giving or playing with escort features. The majority were hoping to find heterosexual preparations, nevertheless heterosexual liking are stronger among the many male respondents (97 per cent) than simply among the many female participants (61 percent). Whilst age restriction to register on the website is actually 18, 10% of your own feminine claimed being younger than just 18 (1417) (select Desk 1, Figure step 1 and Profile 2). 6 The fresh unlock-ended questions managed this new definitions and you will reasons as much as sugar relationship. This new interviews therefore the questionnaire was in fact conducted in the Swedish. Gunnarsson translated study to-be cited for the English.
Analysis
Both the interview and also the survey analysis was examined qualitatively. Once the interviews analysis provided alot more breadth, the fresh questionnaire data given breadth. Specific proportions of new questionnaire study were examined quantitatively, including, age, gender, and you will sexual positioning. Interview transcriptions and you will qualitative survey answers was basically processed into the NVivo compliment of a mix of research-motivated and layout-inspired coding. The issue of how exactly to categorize sugar matchmaking (especially in reference to prostitution) and the problem of important against. built-in reasons have been conceptually key in the fresh coding process. Logical memo writing was applied to help you document habits and you will interesting layouts throughout the programming as well as a far more alternative reading of your point. In accordance with the observance the material portrayed an impressive selection off means and event, i wanted a way of categorizing this type of distinctions. They became obvious that the knowledge don’t are different along one solitary axis, very, instead of splitting them with the that number of kinds (cf. Scull 2020), we chose to cardio the analysis around three key dimensions you to emerged as the utmost definitive organizers of differentiations: (1) The newest practical articles regarding sugar matchmaking arrangements: What exactly do glucose daters would to one another? (2) New forms of settlement on it: How is babies settled? and you can (3) Babies’ inspirational known reasons for glucose dating: As to the extent do they participate in this new arrangement on account of the material pros otherwise while they delight in the activities into the and off on their own? On after the, new interview and you can questionnaire analysis is examined as one with respect to certain kinds of sugar relationship per for each identifying dimension. If possible, quantity are provided regarding the volume of each and every classification certainly players. Note, even though, the amounts aren’t fundamentally member of your own broader people regarding glucose daters, and that participants usually can’t be neatly divided into categories, because so many have a selection of more event additionally the issues driving the details generation just weren’t made to match it article’s logical proportions.
Show
The initial aspect central getting distinguishing between types of glucose matchmaking concerns the important blogs of your glucose relationships plan. The newest creating of sugar relationships should be divided in to around three groups. In the 1st class, we discover only sexual purchase; on next, babies and you will daddies try involved with an even more total relationships plan together with sex however, also other activities; throughout the third, the functions mingle in the a matchmaking-such as styles, however, sex is not part of the arrangement.
Sex Merely
50 % of the latest baby interviewees (eight regarding fifteen) and another daddy interviewee (1 from nine) equated sugar relationships sometimes to the easy investing out-of sex, otherwise reported having fun with glucose dating sites for this function, as best possible way of using this site otherwise overall method yet others. On questionnaire responses, 13 per cent out-of baby participants and you may step three percent off daddy participants unambiguously equated glucose relationship that have prostitution otherwise attempting to sell/to acquire sex. When inquired about great things about glucose relationships versus other styles out of matchmaking, that survey respondent said, It is far from a kind of relationship [smiley]; your offer and buy sex (little one, 28). A recurrent motif on topic is the fact glucose relationship was a shiny defense for prostitution, given that articulated from the a separate questionnaire respondent: This is prostitution. We are towards the worry about-deception. No body folks desires to call our selves hooker otherwise john. So we changed what and you will introduced they when you look at the a better package (little one, 25). That it harsh feeling in the the true nature regarding glucose relationships contrasts into emphasis from prior browse on the how glucose daters will delimit what they do from prostitution and sex really works ( Chu and you may Laidler 2016; Nayar 2017) and could end up being regarding Swedish mass media, in which sugar dating as a wages having prostitution might have been a beneficial repeating motif ( Olsson 2019; Svenska Dagbladet 2017).